These are valid questions. Literary snack food has its place. In the same way, how often you like to push the boundaries of your literary palate with exotic fare is up to you. This kind of problem arises routinely whenever a society fulfills two criteria.
Get Full Essay Get access to this section to get all help you need with your essay and educational issues. Tolkien has successfully undermined the criticism of all of those opposed to how Beowulf was written.
Tolkien also studies and analyzes how the structure of the poem fits into the meaning of the article. In the speech that Tolkien gives, he is able to show how the critics are wrong, how the structure impacts the storyline, and why this poem does not qualify as an epic.
Tolkien takes it upon himself to show how all of the critics are wrong in their criticisms of Beowulf. The most prevalent and memorable way he does this in his speech is through the allegory of the tower. Tolkien states that a man uses old stones to build a tower in a field, and generations later, there are people who come to examine it and knock it down without even climbing the steps to it.
In the sense of the allegory, the people who come to examine the tower are the critics, and the tower itself is the poem of Beowulf. When the people knock the tower down, the see that it is in a muddle. The critics seem to look at the individual stones and think that there is nothing amazing about those stones and therefore believe that the individual parts of the tower are very weak and lacking of information.
If the critics had taken the time to climb the tower before knocking it over, they would have been able to see how the structure and history of the poem shaped Beowulf. The critics would have realized how the poem fit together and found that it is in fact a viable and wonderful story.
Tolkien states that Beowulf is a narrative poem. It follows a sequential order in that Beowulf kills Grendel and his mother, and then proceeds fifty years ahead to show us the battle with the dragon.
The balance that is given to us in this poem is that the stories about Grendel and his mother are lengthier than the battle with the dragon. The poem must be written this way to show us the importance in the character of whom Beowulf is. Without that, the reader understands no bond with the character, and this poem becomes yet another poem with no meaning.
In its simplest terms it is a contrasted description of two moments in a great life, rising and setting; an elaboration of the ancient and intensely moving contrast between your and age, first achievement and final death.
This summarizes the structure of how the poem works, and how it so effectively captures the reader in the poem. Tolkien believes that Beowulf is a heroic-elegiac poem.
While I believe that it is true that this poem is an elegy, I also believe that it is an epic.
Tolkien believes that Beowulf does not exactly fall into a category. There are no Greek ties to it, nor from any other culture than the one it was written within.
Tolkien also states that it is a dirge. This I do agree with, this story can be thought of as a lament to the dead.
Beowulf lives his life as a hero, and then dies as a hero while fighting with the dragon. Within the Geatish culture this story could easily be taken as both a heroic-elegiac poem and a dirge.
Tolkien brings up many great points in this speech. He successfully discredits those who have disbelief in his views. He shows how Beowulf was meant to be analyzed, and I completely agree with it.
If I were to have the knowledge and understanding of the Old English language and were to criticize this poem, I would definitely have had my view changed upon the poem by how Tolkien analyzed it. I also agree with Tolkien in how he proposes the structure to be laid out. I believe that there is no other way to look at it than how Tolkien does by stating that lengths of the different sections must be how they are.
And finally, I do not agree with the classification that Tolkien puts on the poem. I do believe it to be an epic because that is how we have studied this poem to be. Tolkien undermined the critics by showing how they wrongly criticized it, he showed how the structure of the poem is correct, and shows his beliefs of how the poem is to be classified.
Tolkien is a man of great stature and knowledge and his take on this poem give Beowulf yet another dimension to be studied from.
More essays like this:+ free ebooks online. Did you know that you can help us produce ebooks by proof-reading just one page a day? Go to: Distributed Proofreaders. May 31, · The Monsters and the Critics and Other Essays is a collection of J.R.R. Tolkien's scholarly linguistic essays and lectures.
The book was published posthumously in , edited by Christopher Tolkien. INTRODUCTION by Edward Waterman.
Presented here in its entirety is Don Herron's famous essay, "The Dark Barbarian." This essay first appeared in the book of the same name, The Dark Barbarian, and was first published in This book, and the excellent essays within, were the first to take Robert E.
Howard and his work seriously and to consider Robert E. Howard a major literary figure. Grendel is a character in the Anglo-Saxon epic poem Beowulf (AD –). He is one of the poem's three antagonists (along with Grendel's mother and the dragon), all aligned in opposition against the protagonist initiativeblog.coml is feared by all but Beowulf.
Grendel is described as descended from the lineage of the Biblical figure Cain, from Genesis 4 of the Bible. This book has the essay that is the reason why we still read Beowulf, namely, Beowulf: The Monsters and Critics. That Old English poem was largely ignored by anyone other than specialists in the language until Tolkien explained to the world the wonders to /5(26).
Beowulf: The Monsters and the Criticst ~~~ ~iI, J. R. R. TOLKIEN ~ but for other more authori tative critics, by the dust of the quarrying researchers.
It may well BEOWULF: THE MONSTERS AND THE CRITICS man as an historian of Swedish origins Beowulf is doubtless an.