Voluntary passive euthanasia

Forms of euthanasia Euthanasia comes in several different forms, each of which brings a different set of rights and wrongs. Active and passive euthanasia In active euthanasia a person directly and deliberately causes the patient's death. In passive euthanasia they don't directly take the patient's life, they just allow them to die.

Voluntary passive euthanasia

Utilitarians, deontologists, casuists, communitarians, contractarians, virtue ethicists, and ethicists of other persuasions appeal to differing modes of ethical reasoning. This has consequences for bioethical analyses since the type of ethical theory or religious framework to which a given bioethicist subscribes will be reflected in the practical advice advocated.

They propose a system of bioethics comprised of four major principles: These prima facie principles primarily concern respect for the choices people make, the obligation to help, but not harm, other parties, and the requirement to act in a fair and equitable manner with regard to the distribution of medical burdens and benefits.

Voluntary passive euthanasia

Critics charge that principle-based bioethics is unsuitable for practical decision making because the lack of hierarchical order of principles renders the ranking in any given situation somewhat arbitrary.

Because it is able to be taught in a comprehensive and accessible manner, however, this approach is favored in many bioethics teaching programs. Of all the ethical theories, utilitarian modes of reasoning are most easily suited to problem solving in bioethics. This is because Voluntary passive euthanasia guiding principle is singular and unambiguous, providing a clear procedure for decision making.

The basic utilitarian premise is that both individual action and public policy should maximize utility which is normally defined in terms of happiness or preference-satisfaction for the greatest number of people. Its patterns of analysis are congruent with traditional forms of reasoning in public policy.

Utilitarians have contributed sophisticated works to central problems in bioethics, such as abortion, voluntary euthanasia, embryo experimentation, and resource allocation.

Critics of utilitarianism doubt that it is possible to quantify interest or preference satisfaction, and question the feasibility of the utilitarian calculus as a decision directive. Also controversial is the utilitarian rejection of two distinctions which are central to other approaches in medical ethics: These distinctions are important in terms of motives and responsibilities for action, both of which utilitarians ignore, focusing exclusively on consequences as criteria of right action.

Danielsfor example, uses a neo-Kantian form of contractarianism to support his influential argument for a universal right to healthcare. The Kantian moral agent is quite different from the utilitarian agent who acts in order to satisfy interests or desires. Kant was concerned with the motivation of action, and argued that duty alone should motivate morally adequate action.

BBC - Ethics - Euthanasia: Forms of euthanasia

Furthermore, Kant developed Categorical Imperatives, the most influential of which demands that the moral agent never treat other people as mere means to ends however noble these may bebut rather as ends in themselves.

There are some reasonably clear differences between Kantian and utilitarian bioethical decision making. All other things being equal, utilitarians would conclude that it is right to kill one person to save the lives of 10 others, while a Kantian would argue that it is unacceptable to kill an innocent person.

Kantians are not concerned about the consequences of action, but rather with the question of whether one can consistently wish to be treated by other rational agents in the same manner as one desires to act in a comparable situation.

Kantian bioethicists tend to defend absolutist positions, such as the rejection of voluntary euthanasia, irrespective of the suffering this may cause. Feminist bioethics raises the question of unequal distribution of social power, and the subsequent biases that manifest in the life sciences, medical practices, and philosophical ethics.

Voluntary passive euthanasia

There are numerous feminist approaches to these fields. Feminist projects provide a critique of traditional approaches to bioethics, focusing on the effects that the historical exclusion of women and their experiences have had on theory production.

The Basic Definitions

Some feminists aim merely to provide a corrective to dominant theories and practices, while others embark on the more radical project of creating positive feminist theories and practices which differ fundamentally from those which are the objects of critique.Active Voluntary and Nonvoluntary Euthanasia The term euthanasia originated from the Greek word for "good death." It is the act or practice of ending the life of a person either by lethal injection or the deferment of medical treatment (Munson, , p.

). Voluntary Active Euthanasia This paper will discuss the benefits of Active Voluntary Euthanasia (VAE). Although it is sometimes referred to as mercy killings, it is one of . There is a widespread belief that what is referred to as passive (voluntary) euthanasia, wherein life-sustaining or life-prolonging measures are withdrawn or withheld in response to a competent patient's request, is morally acceptable.

Voluntary euthanasia is the practice of ending a life in a painless manner. Voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide have been the focus of great controversy in recent years.

On this page

As of , some forms of voluntary euthanasia are legal in Belgium, Colombia, . Voluntary passive euthanasia, Withholding Extraordinary measures Person says, Don't use those medical measures because the chance of extending life would be too small. Nonvoluntary euthanasia.

It seems simply unfair for this concern to count decisively against non‐voluntary active euthanasia when it does not do so for non‐voluntary passive euthanasia. It is .

Euthanasia, passive legal definition of Euthanasia, passive